If last week’s image could be considered a rough draft of sorts, then this might well be seen as the final iteration (albeit in a very small series of two) that, despite being taken just 33 seconds after the other one, builds on it in almost every way and is, in my opinion, a significantly better image as a result. The same basic idea is present here as well as the original: a dying cluster of four small leaves, backlit, in the center of the frame surrounded by other elements of nature bathed in brilliant overhead light from the afternoon winter sun. But, as my kids might say, this image has leveled up significantly.
First, and most notably, there is simply a lot more color in this shot. Instead of a monochrome color palette we now have rich, deep reds on the periphery and dull greens in the background. While the relatively black-and-white original was find on its own merits, seeing a similar shot replete with color reveals how empty the first one was by comparison.
It’s not just the color that’s improved here, though that’s the most obvious element. The first shot was not just mono-chromatic but mono-planar as well. The leaves in the center felt like they might as well have just been taped to a sheet of flat paper, whereas here the top-right leaf is curled towards the camera like fingers on a hand, closing as if grasping tightly on to an unseen support. It makes the subject feel three-dimensional and, as a result, more interesting and perhaps even compelling. It lends a sense of character, as my wife might say. The rest of the composition feels more fleshed-out as well, with a vertical branch in the foreground which essentially compresses the frame and imparts a sense of intimacy, as if we the viewer are peeking into a hidden world. The stalk on which the leaves are mounted recedes into the background, where more red leaves reside.
Finally, I did a better job on the raw exposure settings–specifically the smaller f/11 aperture which resulted in more of the subject being in focus due to the wider focal plane. The original was shot at f/6.7 and keen-eyed viewers might have looked at the original on Flickr and seen segments of the leaves that were a bit blurry because of the shallow depth of field. That’s not entirely resolved here, but it’s a lot better.
I really like how this turned out, not just from a photography perspective from an educational perspective. In under a minute I learned a lot about what to do, what not to do, and implemented several changes over the original that made the second version a lot better. But the second would not have happened without the first–an important point to remember about the learning process. You can’t get to where you’re going without coming from where you’ve been. And when you do get there, hopefully you will see that there’s still so much left to explore.



