Exploring the wonders of creation through a 50mm lens...and other lenses too.

Note: This sunset time-lapse was taken at the same time I shot the photo above, but with a different camera and from a slightly different location. I used my GoPro Hero 12 Black for the time-lapse, and positioned it just down the boardwalk from where I shot this week’s featured image. I figured the two photos were close enough that it counts :)

One conclusion I kept coming back to during our trip to to the Black Hills and Badlands was that no picture seemed to adequately capture the vastness of the scenes we were witnessing. It didn’t seem to matter what focal length I used, what angle I shot from, what I included in the foreground or background…few things ever really captured the sheer scale of the western wilderness stretched out before us. It’s not that such a thing isn’t possible, just that I found myself continually outside my area of expertise. That said, I was certainly willing to try and ended up with a few photos such as this one that, while not quite A+ level, could certainly be described as not bad. Not too bad at all.

I took this photo looking south from Bigfoot Pass Overlook while the sun was setting just out of frame on the right, with the intention of capturing the brilliant colors of the clouds overhead while also getting the rich red strata layers in the rocky terrain in the foreground. While I’ve seen many beautiful sunsets over the years, I don’t think I have ever seen one quite like this, and even though my Fuji X100F was probably not the ideal camera for this scene it was the one I had with me so I gave it a shot.

I had to think carefully about my exposure settings since there simply wasn’t much light to work with; the sun had actually just dipped below the horizon a few minutes before taking this picture. Though smaller apertures are usually better for scenes like this so you can an ultra-wide depth of field with maximum overall sharpness, while still letting in plenty of light, that just wasn’t going to work here especially since I was shooting handheld. I used a 1/80 shutter at ISO 400 and, of course, shot in RAW to get as much color information as possible.

Unlike my photos from the past few weeks I didn’t put anything in the foreground to give a sense of scale and perspective, but that wasn’t what I was really going for here so I don’t mind too much. I kind of like the elevated shooting position I was in, and if you look carefully at the left side of the frame you will see a truck driving on the road if you really do want a sense of how big the scene is. Not that it’s the Rocky Mountains or anything, but the view isn’t exactly tiny either.

So in the end, I guess the question is: does this photo work? I think so, but that’s kind of up to the viewer to decide. Do I like it? Absolutely.

Last week I shared a picture from Agate Fossil Beds National Monument that wasn’t so much about long-deceased animals as it was about my attempt to capture the vast landscape with my rather diminutive little Fuji X100F–not exactly an easy task for that camera, or any camera, really. It’s a difficult thing to impart a sense of what it feels like to bear witness to miles and miles of sweeping vistas in a single still image, but one technique that often helps is to give viewers something familiar to use as a reference point. Another option is to compose your shot with something in the foreground, like the little yellow flower from last week’s shot. The issue I had with that one, though, was that there were hundreds or even thousands of other flowers in the frame as well, which muddied the foreground a bit and made it a little difficult to suss out the subject. Not so with this picture.

I took this a few days after last week’s photo when we had gone on from the grassy prairie and rolling hills of western Nebraska to the rocky, worn, and weathered terrain of Badlands National Park. (There’s a reason it was used as a filming location for alien planets in Starship Troopers.) I had never been to this part of the country before and, of course, I took a lot of photos while we drove, hiked, and climbed our way across the landscape over the course of a couple days. But one thing became clear pretty quickly: very few of my photos really imparted a sense of just how huge, dry, and desolate these locations really were. I think part of it had to do with the colors: when everything is a similar shade of dull brown, contours blend together and distinguishing characteristics that separate one ridge from another tend to disappear when captured in a picture.

Alas, what’s a photographer to do? While I’m not sure I know the answer, I did try two things here, and I’m curious whether you think it worked or not. The first is to take a cue from the Agate Fossil Beds photo and put something familiar in the foreground. With no flowers to be found, I instead focused on this stalk of grass that was shooting skyward from the dry, dusty ground.

The other way in which this photo attempts to capture perspective is through a more intentional use of light and shadow. The subject in the foreground is bright, almost glowing, against the darker rocky terrain behind it which not only draws the viewer’s eye to a specific point of the photo but also invites them to consider the distance between that point and the background far away. To create this effect I did not alter anything in the scene, but rather repositioned myself so as to put the sun off to the right side of the frame and thus lighting my subject (the grass) from the side while also capturing the undulations behind it in shadow.

What I like most about this shot is the memories it brings back, of a special trip that my family and I were able to take together. Sure it’s a fun scene to look at as-is, but for me, the personal stories this tells are memories that I will not soon forget. And hopefully not ever.

If you think this week’s photo bears some striking similarities to the one I shared last week, you would be spot-on. Or, at least, I would be inclined to agree with your assessment and also argue that such similitude is quite intentional. Most of the photos I take in familiar surrounds, such as the OSU campus or my own neighborhood, don’t exactly showcase vast landscapes and distant horizons such as the ones you see here. So, on our trip out west this summer, I wanted to challenge myself to do exactly that: find a way to, hopefully, capture some of the grandeur of the areas we were visiting with my little 35-mm equivalent Fuji X100F. That lens isn’t wide enough to truly present a sense of scale compared to, say, a 14mm lens on a proper landscape camera like the Nikon D810. Or whatever the modern mirrorless equivalent would be :)

Last week’s exercise, if you want to call it that was relatively simple, because Chimney Rock itself conveys a sense of scale naturally, all by itself. It’s such a familiar sight (well, around the Midwest anyway) that it doesn’t necessarily need any help in terms of helping viewers understand how big it is. I mean, to some extent of course, but for the most part when someone looks at a picture of Chimney Rock there’s almost an intuitive understanding of size, shape, and scale.

That’s not really the case with this week’s picture of a hill at Agate Fossil Beds National Monument, a few hours down the road from the Scottsbluff area where I took last week’s picture. I stood by a walking path, camera in hand, and took a couple pictures of the scene you see here (minus the foreground) and it just didn’t really work. All you could see was just a grass-covered mound rising from a sea of green and yellow, but there wasn’t anything to convey just how vast the landscape really was. I was kind of stuck, until I thought about a way I could show perspective by using a different one of my own.

Most people understand the size of a common flower, like the one you see here in the foreground, and so I wondered what would happen if I knelt down and used one of them as the subject and composed the shot so that the fossil bed mound was in the background and also just a little blurry. My idea, and you’ll have to tell me if it worked or not, was to give viewers something familiar in the foreground in order to put the background in a broader context that helped illustrate just how big the entire scene really was. I shot at f/8, which might have actually been a bit too small, as the fossil bed mound might be just a bit too blurry, but I didn’t want to spend so much time fiddling with my camera that I ended up forgetting the whole point of being here in the first place: to spend time with my family. Because in the end, that matters way more than a couple of pictures :)

In July my wife and I took our kids on a 2000-mile road trip out west, spread out over the course of ten days. We had been planning the trip for several months, and it was such a fun and rewarding experience to visit the Black Hills, the Badlands, Mount Rushmore, the Crazy Horse Memorial, and many other locations that none of us had ever seen before. Including, in a bit of an ironic twist for me, the storied western Nebraska landmark Chimney Rock. We both grew up in Lincoln, hundreds of miles to the east, and while this ancient rock formation near the Oregon Trail isn’t exactly a pilgrimage for people where we come from, it’s also not uncommon for folks to have visited it. My brother and my wife even took a bus trip out west in elementary school, along with most of their class, in order to see this and other historical landmarks from the pioneers’ journeys across the continent.

That’s all to provide a bit of context, as you know I’m fond of doing, about this particular image. Though the landmark has shrunk over the years as weather and erosion take their eons-long toll, it still stands proud on the prairie, towering in the distance much as it once did. The question, then, especially as it relates to photography, was how to capture the majesty, or even the essence, of Chimney Rock with naught but a Fuji X100F? The answer, or at least an answer, lies in the image you see today. And while I’m not sure how successful I was at doing what I set out to do, it was a fun and, for me, unique experience that I will likely remember for a very very long time.

Exposure settings weren’t really that much of an issue here. I shot at a relatively pedestrian f/11, 1/450 second, ISO 200. Nothing special at all, and pretty standard for this kind of landscape shot. Instead, it was the compositional choices I made that had a far greater impact. I put the limestone landmark on the left side of the frame, roughly aligning with the classic rule of thirds, which meant the right side was occupied by the sweeping hills that are so common on the Nebraska prairie. The clouds in the sky really did me a solid here, as a wide-open empty blue sky doesn’t always convey a sense of scale–which is pretty important in a shot like this. I also moved myself off the dirt road on which we were standing so as to get the fence in the foreground out of the shot entirely.

And that’s one interesting thing about visiting a spot like this: what you don’t see is often just as essential as what you do. For instance, in addition to a very artificial fence in front, what filled the field directly behind me was dozens of cows. That’s right, all the majesty of Chimney Rock is just a backdrop for a pretty normal Nebraska farm. Many of the cows even came over to say Hello (or, rather, “moo”) to me and my family as we stood around looking at that giant rock in the distance. It was a fun, and to be honest, humbling way to contextualize this image that often evokes images of endless fields and western adventures.

Ok, so before I get too deep into this I want to ask you: what do you think this is? What are you looking at? What’s the first thing that comes to mind when you see this shot? You don’t have to actually answer (I mean, you’re reading text on a blog. You don’t have to do anything at all.)

If something water-related came to mind, you’re probably not alone. This definitely looks like something you’d see in a lake or at the ocean, or even in a fish tank. But it’s nothing like that at all, and in fact kind of the opposite. It’s a flower (what kind? I have no idea, as per usual.) in a clump of tall grass in the Native Plant Corridor on the Oklahoma State University campus. I shot this about ten minutes after last week’s photo which, you might recall, was taken in the early morning after a rainstorm while on my way to work. Obviously by the time I shot this I was already at work, but otherwise the general conditions were pretty similar: calm, overcast, with a fresh post-rainstorm sheen on everything around me. Those kinds of subdued conditions, with diffused overhead lighting through a layer of clouds, often results in some incredible photography opportunities and this was no exception.

I shot this purple flower with my camera pointed to the east to get a bit of backlighting (not as much as last week’s photo, but the same overall idea) with my Nikon D750 and 105mm f/2.8 macro lens. I used an aperture of f/6.7 for this particular photo, though as per usual I took a variety of shots at different apertures to see how things would look with various depths of field. (Depth of fields?)

Side note: A modern mirrorless camera would negate some of this exposure experimentation, as their electronic viewfinders show an exact representation of what the final shot will look like. No guesswork necessary! But the ol’ D750, even with it’s flippy-flappy mirror and old-school optical design, still produces great images and as long as it works I’ll keep on using it.

I liked this shot because the subject is sharp, the background is blurry but not too blurry, and the sunlight poking through the green grass gives the entire scene a sense of life and vibrance that I really enjoy. It also lends a sense of ambiguity: are these land-based flowers or some kind of underwater plants? Upon close inspection it’s probably pretty obvious, but I like that at first glance one might not be quite so sure. Normally I tend to shy away from that kind of thing in my pictures, but every now and then it can be a fun way to present a scene :)